Has it not been said that a presumption of undue influence or unfair dealing arises in the case of a grant by a client to an attorney or by a ward to a guardian? Can it be assumed that this presumption is, itself, presumptuous as in the case of a man on the land?
I still am not so sure about this figure, but I find her words impossible to completely ignore.. I wouldn’t dare engage in the appeal to the stone fallacy to dismiss her opinions, or anyone else’s in general. Is she controlled opposition, or organic? Is her work the genuine article, color of law, or maybe somewhere in between?
