CHG can live on multiple blockchains. Therefore if one chain fails, it won’t really even bleed currency onto other chains. For who would be financially incentivized to keep a bridge open for a compromised chain?
CHG is a protocol, a script. It’s not dependent upon any one chain to operate. But choose wisely your network. And, you know, migrate or spread coin between chains if you suspect a network is compromised or going to become compromised.
In the future, protecting a basket of wallets from being compromised by quantum advents revolves around user’s freedom and capability to revolve encryption protocols. Having the freedom to choose encryption protocols and networks is important for security in the quantum world. And it might help if our pool of encryption protocols are, themselves, revolving randomly.
Euler’s unlocks a powerful macro-verse of detail. Have you seen our own ‘basez?’ What about our ‘proof of non-tampering?’ These or their derivatives will prove important.
Also we gave away the code for Web 3.0 for great reasons. In many ways, the most resilient network in the world is collaboration of single clients powered by the interoperability of script and protocol like CHG.
Don’t like the security of your encryption schemes? Change them. Revolve them. That’s the power of the truly distributed single-client network with full interoperability.
Yes, we have gone full circle with web 4.0. Single client networks.
BTW, can single-client networks, in full, go into cold storage? Yes, they can.
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskScienceFiction/comments/b74q8q/the_matrix_trinity_says_dodge_this_why_doesnt_he/
*the author does not condone nor infer violence in this conveyance
