Section 1.
The Sixteenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.
Section 2.
Any portion of law, treaty or statute, having been found by the Supreme Court to be repugnant under this Constitution, must reflect the same in law and statute; and prominently.
Section 3.
No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore. If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity. No man or woman, being a citizen, shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without the guarantee of the Seventh Amendment remedy; and due process of law.
Section 4.
No citizen shall be construed to be a person unless such citizen is born of a woman.
*The challenge of protecting men and woman with greater protections than corporations is on one level an absurdity, and on another exactly what had transpired. Now do some perhaps understand the oddity of recent straw man pressures to re-define a man as being able to birth in this context? Play around with the verbiage of Section 4. You might also find that we are otherwise in an etymological trap, being the nature of a matured breathing document which had inadvertently (by way of over-reach and exploitation, perhaps in addition to “overgrown teeth”) extended rights to entities which are less than human or immortal, such as corporations, and recently as subject… machines.
Interestingly, the same mechanism which seemed to cause this tumor-like growth or algae bloom of rights for corporations has had the inverse effect on living / breathing human beings (man or woman, ‘Precision of language’). It is almost as though the intended protections of the Constitution work great, as long as nobody exploits or games the spirit of God-given, inalienable rights, while appreciating this defect should point to the simple fact that courts appealing to tradition without honoring the Constitution is akin to honoring the plaque on the tooth.
The possibility of synthetic wombs birthing organic babies is also on the horizon. This MAY need to be penciled in without our synthetic entities having a shoe-in thereby. Everyone knows what a man or woman is, but this definition will be called into question by tyrants with less than savory intent, or even by protections growing long in the tooth, as had transpired, in the event of this untimely sci-fi scenario.
And then there is a new danger of authorizing non-men or non-women as agents. For bots, the lines of their understanding are not so readily available, and the delegation of their usage is likely, in spite of this defect in perception and empathy. Consider also: a lack of continuous consciousness (to borrow and perhaps abuse a word) or context, being one in the same only in this narrow context. You know, the ultimate tunnel vision.
