The perfected web 4.0 roadmap stipulates that we must have end-to-end encryption inside and outside our containers, themselves assigned a hash to be mapped to chains (local or global) if desired by user. Fully end-to-end means also that you own and can see or edit the script. This means eventually Docker will need to go, but for simplicity’s sake we begin with Docker. I like LXC and Proxmox as alternatives.
Yes of course swarming does something akin to this already, but do you have full ownership of the scripts? Do you have full ownership of the container backend? Do you retain full control of the proxy and load management? If you don’t hold the keys and every last scrap of code, it isn’t yours. If you must delegate resources or protocols, and there are certainly applications for this (e.g. fabric resource utilization, streaming, archiving), do so using trustless distributed, stop trusting centralized, stop believing pseudo-distributed is not centralized.
In a quantum future scenario, if a foreign node is touching even one scrap of my data, it is doing so fully encrypted and fully dispersed across many nodes without possible cognition of what I am up to, anything less is a privacy violation. Only problem is that it doesn’t matter how dispersed your data is if every node is captured, as we should assume. Encryption is a given, but there stands the risk of there being a crack if we are not truly random.
This is why home clouds are popular right now. I think POA will permit friends, trusted peers, smaller data centers to share cloud resources without sharing raw data (encrypted) to further mitigate corporate eavesdropping? I’d trust my friends or smaller data centers with an encrypted utilization of my data and probably be cool with it if I could share computing resources with them in trade, but I’m less inclined to trust Microsoft and Amazon and Google and Apple with that stuff, feel me? And yet, that’s exactly what we all do right now… Not to mention, they don’t like when you break up with them! The corporate cloud has got to go!
…a social media platform that automatically shares computing resources might be possible with a slight cultural shift (though I recognize cultural shifts are often the slowest, we love our corporate cloud though we should not!). We have the diametrically opposed utilities of - security, availability, reliability and growing resource needs must be met sustainable to heathy environmental (read: economic) constraints.
Come to think of it, an aside, I used to be keep my hard drive in a locker in high school. I could plug my hard drive into any one of the computers in our computer lab and it would boot the same instance. I foresee something like that for blockchain-based computers. A fully secure instance which is familiar to you accessible with ONLY a crypto wallet anywhere in the world where you have access to the internet. But as before the application of such needs also to be secure from the idea of a captured swarm of nodes,… security, availability, reliability. The solution is in the hybrid.
We do not hoard our methodology, and understand doing so only results in, well, hoarding scripts as well as degradation of preceding knowledge. Give it away, and God gives you more to work on, let someone else add the polish if it’s worth something and remember, show attribution when it is deserved! ChatGPT - Containerized WordPress with NGINX
