Placeholder - What happens if we solve only for the UNITS when balancing an equation? Is vacuum a relative term? Is absolute zero a relative term? If a so-called vacuum is charged with 1,000,000 volts, will it behave the same as one charged at zero volts? Is zero volts a relative term? What’s even less dense than plasma? What’s even more dense than solid?
Physics in High School was fun! Duder didn’t like my messy notebook. TA guy was bomb diggity though. Collegiate physics one is easy if you observe the ‘real world’ with honesty, physics two walks the slippery slope. Such as it is, YOU, the reader, are the authority. Read that again, kindly. We don’t know exponentially more than we think we know.
Any case 1) when you solve a problem using only units (kg, mm, meters^3) it doesn’t matter about the numbers so much. Math doesn’t lie, and units play nice with algebra. This approach in this context is about reducing to the most fundamental unit 2) Squares, Cubes, ^4, ^1/2 etc. are at first difficult to comprehend in terms of units, and then become integral to our understanding in this context 3) Which units are in fact relative? Is Calculus necessary in this case? Perish the thought…
Is a vacuum relative? What does it mean to approach zero or to approach infinity? Is voltage relative? Is infinity relatively small beside a larger rendition of infinity? What is scale? What is scope?
Complex plot of a wave function that satisfies the nonrelativistic free Schrödinger equation with V = 0. For more details see wave packet
If I spin this, will it play nice with radians? How many axis can a sphere rotate about? Can this and these gradients find themselves moving through space?
… can this multiplicative means of data creation be used to ‘fill back in’ data lost in the shadows of our equations?
Think in terms of software, think in terms of hardware…
Why do ‘float’ functions tend to freeze up binary machines? What happens if we move to analog or trinary logic? Can multiples of our gradients populate simultaneously?
What happens if we resonate our gradients? Coil the coil’s coil….
Is there an end to the level of abstractions where data is over-saturated?
How many dimensions can a computer parse in? Can dimensionality change on-the-fly to achieve maximum simplicity for a given combined set of signals?
Think also in terms of hardware - Spinning, modulating antennae encompassing optimal dimensionality for intended signal. (LINK INVERTER MODULATION + coiled coil + RADAR at sea)
Are expressions of ‘I’ or infinitely trailing tail in fact now tangible or pattern-able in context of such realms? Check out the works called ‘basez?’
