A Unit-based Approach to Understanding - Void Blimp Supplemental

Placeholder - What happens if we solve only for the UNITS when balancing an equation? Is vacuum a relative term? Is absolute zero a relative term? If a so-called vacuum is charged with 1,000,000 volts, will it behave the same as one charged at zero volts? Is zero volts a relative term? What’s even less dense than plasma? What’s even more dense than solid?

pV = nRT


Physics in High School was fun! Duder didn’t like my messy notebook. TA guy was bomb diggity though. Collegiate physics one is easy if you observe the ‘real world’ with honesty, physics two walks the slippery slope. Such as it is, YOU, the reader, are the authority. Read that again, kindly. We don’t know exponentially more than we think we know.

Any case 1) when you solve a problem using only units (kg, mm, meters^3) it doesn’t matter about the numbers so much. Math doesn’t lie, and units play nice with algebra. This approach in this context is about reducing to the most fundamental unit 2) Squares, Cubes, ^4, ^1/2 etc. are at first difficult to comprehend in terms of units, and then become integral to our understanding in this context 3) Which units are in fact relative? Is Calculus necessary in this case? Perish the thought…

As you explore the many hallways of this site, ask yourself, did I leave that Segway there on purpose for the inquiring mind to wander?

IMG_5207



Is a vacuum relative? What does it mean to approach zero or to approach infinity? Is voltage relative? Is infinity relatively small beside a larger rendition of infinity? What is scale? What is scope?

Complex plot of a wave function that satisfies the nonrelativistic free Schrödinger equation with V = 0. For more details see wave packet

Segways:















IMG_5249
What dimension is a rotating system or systems of particles?

See also

image

IMG_5274

IMG_5282

IMG_5277
IMG_5278
IMG_5279

IMG_5280

IMG_5281

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phi